site stats

Under editor review pnas

WebIt could mean that you are right on the cusp of an R&R and the editor wants another opinion. It could also mean that one of the reviews they got was a one liner and they are decent enough to not send it to you and are looking for a replacement. (Looking at you SF - the journal of one line reviews!) Bottom line: chill out. It's out of your hands. Web19 Jun 2014 · The manuscript was stuck with a PNAS editor, who was trying to hand it over to one of the academic editors – and it seems the ones I had been forced to propose were not so interested after all. ... However, I see it as a particular facet of a peer review system under a lot strain and with a lot of problems. Having to choose an editor from a ...

Pnas under editor review - jtxza.fun2ride.de

WebAlthough I respect the role of journal editor and deeply appreciate and honor those who take on this crucial job in our profession, I prefer to make my contributions in other ways. So I … WebOn Feb 11th we received a final round of reviews with a rejection decision by the chairman of the Editorial Board. In the reviews, Reviewer 2 continued to be positive across the … dr online lyrics https://madebytaramae.com

Reviews for "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

WebPnas pending recommendation how long. Pnas under editorial board review pending final recommendation. What does pending recommendation mean in pnas. ... Any idea what that means? 2024-11-09 Under Review 2024-11-08 Under Editor Review 2024-11-08 Under Editorial Review 2024-10-26 Quality Control Review Complete 2024-10-26 Quality Control … Webpnas under editor review know theoretical values of effective density bc eo Subscribe zc he yg The ultimate action-packed science and technology magazine bursting with exciting information about the universe Subscribe today for our Black Frida offer - Save up to 50% Engaging articles, amazing illustrations & exclusive interviews WebA PDF list of Editorial Board members and staff members are posted on the current issue Table of Contents; click on the [Masthead (PDF)] link in the upper right corner. coliship setup

Pnas under editorial board review pending recommendation

Category:under editor review 代表什么阶段？ - 知乎

Tags:Under editor review pnas

Under editor review pnas

PNAS Nexus Oxford Academic

WebResponse: At Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology and many other journals, editorial board members often serve as reviewers. The editorial board receives guidance … http://cbcl.mit.edu/pnas/pnas-response.html

Under editor review pnas

Did you know?

WebOur paper on regenerative axonal fusion is now under review at PNAS!! This would be the Neumann lab's first original research paper. This paper was previously rejected after 'review' by eLIFE. . Update March 7th, 2024: Unfortunately after 52 days in review, our paper has been rejected. We received comments from 2 reviewers, neither who provided ... WebI recently submitted a manuscript to PNAS and was a bit confused by their review system. On the fourth day, it went from "Under Editorial Board Review" to "Pending …

WebA: 对于大多数期刊而言，“With Editor”是指该稿件目前由副编辑（AE）处理。. 在此期间，副编辑会检查校验该稿件的匹配度、研究的新颖性、写作质量以及稿件是否遵守了期刊投稿 … Web4 Dec 2016 · Answer: The change in status from 'Under review' to 'Pending recommendation' means that peer review of your paper is done and the Associate Editor (AE) will now go …

Web21 Mar 2024 · I am pissed with PNAS for a different reason: they published a study on a particular topic from MIT researchers, then some (not well known) Indian guys wrote a paper on the exact same topic. Desk-rejected. Reason: not of broad interest to the community. I learnt about this from complaints I heard from the Indian authors, who wrote to me for … http://xn--zb0b8a770aowi8xe5tfo88a.com/upload/tmp/file/1639397654.pdf

WebThe editors evaluate the reviewers’ comments and make a recommendation to the Editorial Board member, who makes the final decision to accept or reject your paper. The …

WebUnder review: The paper is with reviewers for comment or waiting for the Action Editor’s decision. If the initial reviews are conflicting, the Action Editor may occasionally decide to … dr onlyistWebPNAS的评审流程一共有 3层Review, 首先是 Editorial Board Review ,过了之后再送到 Editor手里 review, Editor make decision觉得你的paper值得送Reviewer,才会进入“Under Review”阶段。 如果你的Stage从“Under Editorial Board Review"直接跳到了”Pending Recommendation" 或者 从 “Under Editor Review"直接跳到了”Pending Recommendation"，这两种情况下都大 … coliship installerWebPNAS的评审流程一共有3层Review, 首先是Editorial Board Review,过了之后再送到Editor手里 review, Editor make decision觉得你的paper值得送Reviewer,才会进入“Under Review” … dr online medicaid anixetyWeb1 Apr 2024 · The average number of reviewers during the entire peer-reviewed process (include both accepted and rejected manuscript). Please share your experiences with the … colishipsWeb27 Sep 2016 · GOOD PUBLISHING PRACTICES. PNAS offers quick turn-around times: the initial decision is taken in about 40 days; the average time between acceptance and … dr on manly roadWeb13 Apr 2024 · The definition of editor acceptance rate is the percentage of all articles submitted to PNAS Editor Donald Canfield that was accepted for publication. Based on … dr online chatWebassigned the manuscript to an Associate Editor – there is no separate system status to indicate this). The Action Editor may decide to make a decision without allocating reviewers. Under review: The paper is with reviewers for comment or waiting for the Action Editor’s decision. If the initial reviews are conflicting, dronmat neo watch